Methods for Selecting Level of Automation: A Critical Comparison of Approaches and Integrated Proposal - Collaboration Collaborative Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2015

Methods for Selecting Level of Automation: A Critical Comparison of Approaches and Integrated Proposal

Anas Salmi
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 959200
Dhulia Jayavardhan
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 973395
Joshua D. Summers
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 973390
Eric Blanco

Résumé

The purpose of this paper is to first review and then propose methods for determining the appropriate levels of automation for assembly operations. Based on a literature review in decision making methods, an evaluation against method requirements is made. The analysis shows that no single method fulfills all the defined requirements, yet two methods are identified that jointly address all the requirements: Boothroyd’s and Dewhurst (B&D) method and the Dynamo method. B&D and Dynamo methods are then combined into a new method, exploiting elements of each. An additional step for graphical modeling of the assembly processes using the Assembly Sequence Modeling Language (ASML) is integrated to facilitate alternative exploration. This newly proposed method is discussed and revealed promising in the field of assembly systems Level of Automation (LoA) measurement and improvement.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01236183 , version 1 (01-12-2015)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01236183 , version 1

Citer

Anas Salmi, Dhulia Jayavardhan, Joshua D. Summers, Pierre David, Eric Blanco. Methods for Selecting Level of Automation: A Critical Comparison of Approaches and Integrated Proposal. ASME 2015 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - IDETC/CIE 2015, Aug 2015, Boston, MA, United States. ⟨hal-01236183⟩
89 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More